Ludiya:
Partnering with People
An
Effort in Redevelopment with Community Participation
The
Philosophy
The
'house' is the ultimate physical manifestation and expression
of an individual's identity. It is the private realm of absolute
control over which one exercises complete authority and is therefore
the platform on which his needs and desires begin to be realized.
Thus the character of the house reflects not only the aspirations
of the resident, but is also an indicator of his social, economic
and cultural inclinations and standing.
Housing
design could be of distinct origins: either the result of an
elaborate and sustained self selection process collectively
by the users themselves, a natural evolution of tried and tested
methods of space making to suit the socio-cultural lifestyles
of the people over the years; or the outcome of the consolidated
effort of a specific group of people with authorization to provide
housing solutions to a different and larger user group. The
former case is typically seen in traditional builtforms and
housing types, while the latter is a more recent phenomenon
(seen predominantly in the post-industrial age).
The
traditional dwelling typologies and houseforms were ideally
suited for the climate, culture and lifestyles of the region,
since these were the basic resources which initiated their design.
They were also tailored to the individual's requirements - using
the architectural vocabulary and language unique to the people,
but articulated as per the needs of the person. This led to
an overall builtform of collective coherence with vitality and
diversity due to individual specificity.
In
a community comprising of a varied number of individuals, it
becomes important to realize the fact that regardless of the
common collective identity they possess, each individual is
unique in himself. This observation would be a direct reflection
of the need for Man to both belong to a group as a social animal,
and simultaneously preserve his individualism as a thinking
being.
This
understanding of collective conformity with independent identity
is vital to the designer in the process of providing effective
solutions to the issue of mass housing. The lack of appreciation
of this fact could result in the treatment of the process as
creation of 'shelter' for a specific number of people - a mere
statistical solution.
Kutch
has a distinct identity essentially derived from its indigenous
culture, its traditional architecture, local craft and ethnic
communities, which is very vibrant and unique. This is a living
heritage; i.e. the lifestyles of the people are still steeped
in traditional practices, even today. The culture of this region
has a distinctly visible identity.
This
vibrant and culturally rich region has been devastated in the
recent earthquake. And we see in this calamity an opportunity
to revive and strengthen the same through interventions by playing
a facilitator's role in participatory processes involving people
and community in redeveloping villages in a comprehensive and
sustainable manner. This process involves the following areas
of intervention.
· Housing
· Social structure
· Economic structure
· Amenities and facilities
· Resource management
The
scope of work:
· Community building
· Social redevelopment
· Rehabilitation
· Newer development
The
village of Ludiya epitomizes the case of the traditional village
of these parts, with characteristic lifestyles and builtform.
The building pattern emerges out of the processes of evolution
of a socio-culturally and geo-climatically relevant and contextual
builtform. This village also has a stark and visibly distinct
character which easily helps distinguish it as representative
of villages in this region. Strategically located near Khavda,
and being nodal in terms of proximity and available infrastructure
(electricity, water supply etc.), the village was ideal for
demonstration of the participatory method of design.
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
Village
Profile
1) Name: Ludiya
2)
Location: Banni District, Kutch. 70 kms towards North
from Bhuj, 500 kms to the NorthWest of Ahmedabad, 3 kms
from Khawda.
3)
Area: 5 sq. kms
4)
Address:
Ludiya village
Banni District
Kutch
5)
Population: 1800 people (350 Harijans, 1450 Muslims) 225
families
6)
Communities:
Scheduled castes: 66 nos. (50 in Naya Vaas, 16 in Purana
Vaas)
Muslims : 159 nos.
Lokmani Phaluji
Jagmalani Phaluji
Tajvani Paru
Mahepayi Vaadh
Gova Vaadh
Movar Vaadh
7)
Occupation:
Decorative furniture (men)
Bharat potan (women)
Agriculture (monsoon farming) and labour
Cattle breeding and animal husbandry
8)
Education: Primary education (upto 4th std - Govt. primary
school: 2 teachers)
9)
Amenities:
Electricity available
Panchayat Ghar existed, but is now obsolete
Water supply from tankers and Khavda pipeline
10)
Organisational features:
· Lies on the north-eastern edge of Banni, forming part
of area called Pachcham
· Village comprises of 2 large clusters - Muslim and Hindu
(harijan)
· Organic plan geometry
· No streets - residual spaces between houses used for
movement
· Unit edge defined by plinth, Cluster edge defined by
brush fence
· Incremental growth of unit and cluster
· Intricately decorated dwellings from inside and outside
· Characteristic typology of 'bhunga' dwellings |
click
on picture to see a larger image |
click
on picture to see a larger image |
Layout of existing clusters
The village is made up of different housing clusters.
The Muslim clusters are the main ones, found in Ludiya,
Gova Vandh, Movar Vandh, Mepai Vandh and Khadda Vandh.
The Harijan community is divided into two clusters - the
older Harijan Vandh and the more recent settlement, the
Nava Vandh. Each cluster is comprised of various dwelling
units, depending on the number of families. Each family
cluster also depends on the number of its members.
|
|
|
People
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
Craft
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
Architecture
and Construction
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
Project
Proposal
The 'bhungas' of Banni
· The bhongas are a typical traditional house form peculiar
and characteristic of this part of the country.
· They are manifestations of the vernacular building traditions
exemplary of thesocio-cultural and geo-climatic contexts of
this region, thus in part, contributing to the distinct identity
of this area.
· Ludiya village, lying deep in the hinterlands of the Kutch
region, has more or less completely retained its authentic and
original character, both in terms of the built environment as
well as the lifestyles of the people without getting affected
by extraneous forces.
· The Harijan community, traditionally, are more inclined to
construct these elaborately decorated and intricate dwelling
forms characteristic of these places than the other Muslim communities.
The Harijans also exemplify the characteristic means of livelihood
through the traditional crafts of decorated wooden furniture,
embroidered clothing and leather, while the Muslims are more
often employed in pastoral pursuits.
· There was a general trend of neglect and unwillingness on
the part of the Harijans in the younger generations towards
the continuation of this tradition of 'bhunga' construction
due to various external influences and pressures - primarily
economic and otherwise (time taken for construction, periodic
maintenance, fire hazard etc.) deteriorated to that of a 'shelter'
alone, resulting in the undervaluation of the traditional wisdom
behind their making.
· Ludiya epitomizes the case of the traditional building pattern
emerging out of the processes of evolution of a socio-culturally
and geo-climatically relevant and contextual built form. This
long established and successful pattern, which holistically
integrated lifestyles, resources and resultant builtform, was
suddenly being abandoned and vandalized due to modern economic
pressures.
The
earthquake of January 26, 2001, that left most parts of Kutch
devastated and in ruins, came at a time when the villagers had
begun to give up the traditional building form in favour of
the "pucca" houses in stone masonry, an influence from the urban
centers signifying a more 'permanent' and 'prestigious' habitat.
The fact that very few of the traditional dwelling types were
affected severely by the quake, while almost all of the so-called
'permanent' dwellings were more or less razed to the ground,
brought to the fore the wisdom of the ancients once again. This
accidental but practical test, allayed the fears of the villagers,
made them realise the sense behind the 'bhunga' and became the
opportunity to convince them of their inheritance and the need
to conserve it, at the same time not having to compromise on
their aspirations.
Ludiya:
Earthquake affected structures
Type
of house |
Bhungas |
Kaccha |
Pucca |
Kuccha-Pucca |
Totally
destroyed |
5 |
50 |
36 |
13 |
Irrepairably
damaged |
7 |
41 |
30 |
22 |
Repairably
damaged |
13 |
17 |
13 |
16 |
Little
damage |
3 |
1 |
45 |
4 |
No
damage |
8 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Total |
31 |
111 |
84 |
56
|
Bhungas
unaffected by earthquake
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
|
The
Participatory Process
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
1: Motivating the people and discussing the requirements
of the relocated settlement. From these discussions,
establishing parameters of the area and extent of the
site, number of plots needed and the facilities required.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
2: Simulating a process and proposing a site plan based
on the organisation of clusters around open spaces.
The organisation of clusters was to take into account
the interrelationships of the peopl of each plot, their
proximities to the road and other site features.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
3: Feedback and reactions from end users. Understanding
their priorities, aspirations and preferences to be
able to reconsider proposal to suit their needs.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
4: Aspirations of the users showing prioritisation of
relationship with circulation nodes and accessibility
as well as respecting social hierarchies, significance
and status. Spiritual needs of orientation, sanctity and
auspicious elements.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
5: Reorganisation of layout with feedback incorporating
reactions, yet introducing open spaces, maintaining
inter/intra relationship of plots and spaces and the
sequence of plots on the site.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
6: Carrying the simulation kit onto the site for reaffirming
and confirming the layout on the actual site. This is
also to assist better visualisation and smaller onsite
improvisations.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
7: Pegging the typical plot cornerson the site for the
estimation, confirmation and realisation of the extent,
orientation, plot size and shape.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
8: The result of the participatory processes of incorporating
the feedback from the users in the evolution of the
layout at a schematic level of relationships and proximities.
|
click on picture to see a larger image
Stage
9: After full confirmation and agreement of the users,
the finalised site plan is drawn up denoting ownership
also.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Stage
10: The built form of the village is allowed to evolve
from the independent requirement of each family.
|
Project
Progress
click
on picture to see a larger image
Provision
of construction materials and creation of a material
bank for the village.
|
click
on picture to see a larger image
Each
family involved in the construction of their own 'bhunga'
with family members contributing their time as manpower.
|
This
report was contributed by the Vastu-Shilpa Foundation for Studies
and Research in Environmental Design
Sangath, Thaltej Road, Ahmedabad - 308 054, India.
Telephone: 079-7451555
Fax: 079-7452006
E-mail: vsf@vsnl.com
Environment Design Team : Vastu-Shilpa Foundation
· Yatin Pandya
· Dilip Karpoor
· Sonya Jensen
· Babubhai Jethwa
· Ranish Trivedi
Principal Non-Governmental Organisation: Manav Sadhana